Published on TheHill.com on July 14, 2009
Now President Obama says in The Washington Post that he never envisioned that his stimulus package would afford quick relief to the American economy, but would do so only after it had run its two-year course. But when it was passed, Obama sang a different tune, urgently demanding its enactment to speed relief to a sagging economy. He claimed it would “create or save” 600,000 jobs. Now, even as the economy loses 450,000 jobs each month, he pretends that it is a matter of time until the stimulus kicks in.
He now justifies the stimulus package by saying it was adopted to prevent the “collapse” of the economy and the banking systems. But it was really the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), first passed under President Bush, that stopped the banks from going under. At the time of the enactment of the stimulus package, Obama never mentioned that he was counting on it to save the banks.
All these shifting justifications are designed to explain why the stimulus package has totally failed to accomplish anything. Not only has it done no good. It has done significant harm by ballooning the deficit, driving up interest rates, creating doubts about the U.S. currency and fanning inflationary fears.
But Obama has paid and will continue to pay dearly for betting on his stimulus package. Because of it, the Bush recession is becoming the Obama recession much faster than it would have had he adopted a more gradual approach to solving economic problems. By jumping in immediately, as he did, in order to increase government spending and pass eight years of Democratic dreams in one day, he made the public expect a solution.
At first, a sick patient looks forward to seeing the doctor. But when the medicine his physician gives him fails to make him better, he is likely to turn on his doctor. And then, gradually, when it dawns on him that the cure is making the disease last longer and get worse, he will really get mad at the physician. This is Obama’s fate.
The stimulus package used up all the wiggle room he had to increase the budget deficit. He probably could have passed the healthcare program without a tax increase had he not already sent the deficit soaring with his massive spending. (Hillary and Bill pretended that there was no need to raise taxes to pay for their 1993 reform package and few questioned their presumption.) But now that the deficit has soared to 12 percent of the gross domestic product, everyone realizes that taxes must go up to pass healthcare “reform,” making its adoption even less likely. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) has passed $550 billion of tax increases, but everyone knows that at least $1 trillion is required. And, in the current environment, Congress will not vote to add the balance to the deficit, even if Charlie wants to “charge it.”
Finally, Obama has laid a trap for himself. Just as the economy is coming out of its recession — in 2010 and 2011 — and he begins to run for reelection, he is going to face massive inflation. The money supply has more than tripled since October of 2008 and is going up each week as the Fed buys Treasury bills and other securities to “monetize the debt” (i.e., give other people money so they can lend it back to the government and charge it interest for doing so). With each new infusion of cash, the problem of avoiding inflation becomes particularly severe. Obama could well lose the elections of 2012 because of the inflation his deficit has created.
Of course, we all know that the only way to put the inflation virus back in the test tube is to trigger a new recession, this time caused by massive increases in interest rates, as Fed Chairman Paul Volcker did in 1979. If the recession doesn’t doom Obama to a single term, the inflation will. And if the inflation doesn’t get him, the subsequent recession will.
The deeper he gets into his term, the more it is apparent that he threw it all away when he first took office and demanded over $1 trillion in stimulus and supplemental appropriation spending. He was doomed to lose the game right after he received the first kickoff.
Only subscribers to Dick Morris' '08 Play-By-Play may post comments. You must be logged in to post a comment.
[…] quick relief to the American economy, but would do so only after it had run its two-year course. Joe Biden the moron vice President has said “they misread the economy”, and has admited … of the money from the stimulus can be wasted (this on top of the waste of liberal pet projects such […]
As a small business owner, I count on my select few employees to provide advice on how to best manage and build my company. I have a lawyer to advise me on contract terms; I have an accountant to advise me on how to book my income; I have technical folks to help me construct my solutions. I count on these experts to share their knowledge and guide my decision making as I cannot surely be an expert in every field. I guess my rhetorical question is: does Obama have economists guiding him on fiscal decision making? What kind of economist would ever think this stimulus package would work? Any historians on the payroll? Other countries (Japan) have done exactly this with catastrophic failure, and we think we can succeed now? This entire presidency thus far throws logic to the wind and it is terrifying that people didn’t have the foresight when voting for Obama or most any Democrat. In about 6 months you’ll see “I didn’t vote for Obama and now I have to pay for your mistake” t-shirts on the subway.
Michael
Objectivian.com
Newtown, CT
I believe that Dick Morris is correct - inflation is on its way. I have a small beverage company and over the course of the last several years we would see one or two price increases which would be on the order of 5 to 10 cents.
This past month there have been 175 increases with some reaching as high as 20 percent.
I would also like to point out that this magical $250,000 number of Obama’s can be reached quite easily in gross sales for even a small company.
Our sales are down about 12 percent. If this health care bill is passed and I end up paying a lot more taxes, then one employee will be let go and I will reduce my hours of operation.
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104219
Lib talker, Lou Dobbs now asking eligibility questions
Radio, television, newspapers taking note of long-running dispute
Dick, What is your take on this issue?
[…] [More] Web Logs You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. […]