Published in the New York Post on March 9, 2008.
Clintons are trying to steal the nomination from Barack Obama - and he can’t let them.
The Clintons’ campaign attacks put Obama in a bind.
If he doesn’t answer in kind, he’s toast.
But if he does, they’ll have forced him off his winning message of hope and change from the bitter politics of the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush eras.
If they pull him off his game and onto theirs, they can wrest away the Democratic convention victory that he’s earned.
The solution for Obama is clear: Reply in kind, but do it through surrogates.
Obama must answer Hillary’s negative attacks and make counterpunches of his own to rock her back on her heels.
His holier-than-thou posture is fine for the opening stages of a campaign, but when your opponent starts throwing mud, you’ve got to answer.
While Hillary takes aim at Obama’s buddy, Tony Rezko, the Obama people need to explore the dimensions of Hillary’s relationship with con artist Norman Hsu, who donated almost a million dollars to her campaign, money he’d scammed from gullible investors.
Obama needs to enlist the likes of Ted Kennedy and his other supporters in making the case against Hillary.
After her victories in Texas and Ohio, Hillary is once again in play. Negatives about her matter. A full frontal assault on her integrity and on Bill’s conflicts of interest (remember they have joint finances) will work and will stop the bleeding in the Obama campaign.
The Clintons would like nothing better than for Obama to remain passive, clinging to his desire to raise the tone of our politics.
If Sen. Clinton resorts to negative ads in the remaining primary states, Obama needs to do so, too, always keeping himself off camera and using an announcer to articulate his message.
As long as his attacks center on Hillary’s and Bill’s financial dealings and their relationships with lobbyists and special-interest groups, he will remain on message and his attacks will be in sync with his general approach to the race.
But Obama must make no mistake - it’s time to fight back.
 |
Comments
Only subscribers to Dick Morris' '08 Play-By-Play may post comments. You must be logged in to post a comment.
That sweet young Obama supporter who was the kid in HRC’s 3:00 in the morning ad was a stroke of serendipity. Her enthusiastic involvement in Obama’s campaign and fresh-faced support for his agenda was a win-win spot that makes that skeery ad seem almost like exploitation of kids.
The US Postal Service in South Florida is full of Criminals. Crackheads deliver the mail in their own cars. When I moved to Florida in 2000, my paychecks were stolen over and over before they got to my mailbox. The Clintons will push to use the mail system for a Re-Vote because they can really stuff the ballots!
too bad the texas voters didn’t take care of this in a more decisive manner…instead, they came out to vote, they saw their “shadows” and now we get 7 more weeks of Hillary…
I suspect Hillary’s negatives against Obama are setting him up to loose the November election if he wins the Dem nomination. Then she can wait out the 4 years of McCain and try again in 2012 as the saviour of the Dems, “see what happens when you don’t pick me”.
So, the “3am girl”, Casey Knowles, is now 18, an Obama supporter and voluteer.
Once again we see Hillary re-cycling 10 year old footage.
By the way, I would expect in Obama’s White House the phone would be answered on the first ring.
… oops typo. “volunteer”.
There is talk of John McCain having a cancer problem. Even if he only has two years to serve as president….I’ll take that rater then fore years of either Hillary or Obama.
Pat Lamm, PA
March 21, 2008 - 3:55pm
opps
typos: rather and four
Pat Lamm, PA